Trendy Bambini
Digital Rights & Child Protection

Trendy Bambini

When viral videos blur the line between family fun and child labor, lawmakers around the world are stepping in

The videos look like play. A child opens a box of toys, tries on a sequined jacket, dances in front of a ring light. The parents hold the camera. Millions watch. Bruno Studer, a member of France's National Assembly, spent two years trying to figure out where the line falls between family fun and child labor.

Studer introduced a bill in 2019 aimed at what he called a "grey zone." Some children featured in online videos were not technically employees. They had no contracts. They received no wages in their own names. But they spent hours each week filming content that generated substantial advertising revenue. Their parents collected the checks.

€150K
Monthly earnings by top child influencers
$26M
Ryan Kaji's 2019 earnings
23M
YouTube subscribers for Ryan's World

The French parliament adopted the law unanimously on October 6, 2020. President Emmanuel Macron signed it thirteen days later. Under the new rules, children under 16 appearing in monetized videos must be registered with labor authorities. Their working hours are now limited. A portion of their earnings goes into a protected account at the Caisse des dépôts et consignations, accessible only when the child turns 16.

French National Assembly building Legal documents and contracts
France's National Assembly passed groundbreaking legislation to protect child influencers in 2020

Studer pointed to the scale of the problem. Some French child influencers were earning up to 150,000 euros per month. Brands shipped free products. Advertising deals multiplied. The parents managed everything. The children, in many cases, had no legal claim to the money they helped generate.

The 2019 Forbes list put a number on the phenomenon. Ryan Kaji, an eight-year-old from Texas, earned $26 million that year reviewing toys on his YouTube channel. He had topped the same list the previous year at $22 million. His channel, Ryan's World, had accumulated 23 million subscribers by filming him opening boxes and playing with what was inside.

Some children featured in online videos were not technically employees. They had no contracts. They received no wages in their own names. But they spent hours each week filming content that generated substantial advertising revenue.

— The "Grey Zone" of Child Influencer Labor

Caroline Andre-Hesse, Vice-Chair of the International Bar Association's Employment and Industrial Relations Law Committee, identified three concerns about child influencers. The first involves privacy. The second involves compensation. The third involves who decides when the child stops working. Under traditional child modeling contracts, agencies maintain records and parents sign agreements with specific terms. Social media dispensed with the paperwork.

Three Key Concerns About Child Influencers

  • Privacy: Children's images and personal lives broadcast to millions without their informed consent
  • Compensation: No guarantee that children receive fair payment for their work
  • Autonomy: Who decides when the child stops working and leaves the public eye?

The French law requires video-sharing platforms to adopt charters promoting responsible use of children's images. Children gained a right to request deletion of their own content without parental consent. Penalties for violations can reach 75,000 euros and five years' imprisonment.

Digital technology and child protection
New legislation aims to protect children's digital rights and future earnings

Other jurisdictions took notice. Illinois passed an amendment to its child labor laws in August 2023. Children under 16 featured in online content are now guaranteed a percentage of resulting profits, held in trust until they turn 18. The law took effect in July 2024.

California had existing protections for child performers dating back to 1939, after Jackie Coogan's parents spent his entire fortune from his acting career. The original Coogan Law required trust accounts for child actors. The state updated these rules in 1999 and again in recent years to address social media.

Legislative Timeline

1939
California passes the original Coogan Law after Jackie Coogan's parents spent his entire acting fortune
1999
California updates the Coogan Law with new protections for child performers
2019
France — Bruno Studer introduces bill targeting child influencer "grey zone"
2020
France — Parliament adopts child influencer law unanimously; Macron signs it into law
2023
Illinois passes amendment to child labor laws for online content
2024
Illinois law takes effect in July, guaranteeing trust accounts for child influencers

The platforms themselves remain difficult to regulate. Studer acknowledged that French authorities cannot penalize companies for hosting videos of children who lack work permits because the content is not illegal. The law targets parents and companies that hire child influencers, not the distribution channels.

Video content creation

The Business of Child Content

A 2019 Pew Research Center study found that YouTube videos featuring children averaged nearly three times as many views as other content types. The business incentive runs in one direction. Platform algorithms reward engagement. Children generate engagement. Parents control the accounts.

Truth in Advertising filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission in 2019 alleging that Ryan's World failed to properly disclose sponsored content. The organization claimed around 90 percent of the channel's videos contained at least one paid product placement aimed at viewers too young to distinguish reviews from commercials.

Outside the thresholds set by the law, a child's work remains subject to parental discretion. The state can issue recommendations about health, safety, and working hours, but enforcement depends on clear violations.

— Caroline Andre-Hesse on the Limits of Legislation

Andre-Hesse noted the limits of the French approach. Outside the thresholds set by the law, a child's work remains subject to parental discretion. The state can issue recommendations about health, safety, and working hours, but enforcement depends on clear violations. Family vlogging accounts, where children appear alongside parents in daily life content, occupy yet another grey zone.

Child looking at camera
As legislation evolves, the question remains: how do we protect children in an era where the camera is always rolling?
滚动至顶部